Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWan, Siyu
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-14T17:57:00Z
dc.date.available2018-02-14T17:57:00Z
dc.date.issued2017-05
dc.identifier.otherwan_siyu_201705_ma
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/wan_siyu_201705_ma
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/37213
dc.description.abstractThe article aims to measure implicit gender-science stereotype of female and male individuals. A Many-Facet Rasch Measurement analysis was used to disentangle the contribution of specific associations to the overall IAT measure. A preference for associating males with science and females with liberal arts is observed in both gender groups. Male participants show stronger stereotype than female participants, and this preference is driven primarily by associating males with science rather than females with liberal arts. Besides, some stimulus words played different roles to the overall IAT effects. This research supported that MFRM is a useful method for exploring IAT. As consequences, we argue that researchers should be more careful when choosing stimulus for IAT and interpreting IAT effects.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectImplicit Gender-Science Stereotype
dc.subjectImplicit Association Test
dc.subjectMany-Facet Rasch Model
dc.titleAn application of Many-Facet Rasch Model to the analysis of an implicit associate test
dc.title.alternativedisentangling implicit gender-science stereotype
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.degreeMA
dc.description.departmentEducational Psychology and Instructional Technology
dc.description.majorEducational Psychology
dc.description.advisorLouis Castenell
dc.description.committeeLouis Castenell
dc.description.committeeGeorge Engelhard, Jr.
dc.description.committeeMartha Carr


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record