Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmith, Anne Eleanore Chesky
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-28T04:30:33Z
dc.date.available2017-03-28T04:30:33Z
dc.date.issued2016-05
dc.identifier.othersmith_anne_e_201605_ma
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/smith_anne_e_201605_ma
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/36660
dc.description.abstractWhen aggregated, how individual landowners decide to manage their land can have dramatic implications for stream health regionally. In this study, I interviewed 31 western North Carolina landowners who had participated in a riparian buffer restoration program more than a decade ago. I compared the landowners’ reported preferences for managing their riparian zones to the current average width of their riparian buffer. The results of this study show that even among those who invested in riparian buffer restoration work on their property, lack of understanding of how or why to maintain a riparian buffer as well as individual preferences for narrower buffers often outweighed the goals of the restoration. Narrower average buffer widths were generally attributed to management that met a personal aesthetic preference or allowed visual or physical access to the river. Among landowners who actively managed their land, the most successful buffers were those under conservation easement.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightsOn Campus Only Until 2018-05-01
dc.subjectriparian buffer
dc.subjectMacon County
dc.subjectNorth Carolina
dc.subjectconservation easement
dc.titleRiparian buffer width and landowner preference in Macon County, North Carolina
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.degreeMA
dc.description.departmentAnthropology
dc.description.majorAnthropology
dc.description.advisorTed Gragson
dc.description.committeeTed Gragson
dc.description.committeeSeth Wenger
dc.description.committeeDonald R. Nelson


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record