Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJung, Na Young
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-01T14:36:51Z
dc.date.available2016-09-01T14:36:51Z
dc.date.issued2015-08
dc.identifier.otherjung_na-young_201508_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/jung_na-young_201508_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/35754
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated the effects of three types of service recovery on customers’ post-recovery satisfaction, as mediated by customers’ perceived justice and emotions and moderated by the severity of the service failure and their expectations of service recovery. The study employed a scenario-based experimental survey method in an online apparel retailing setting and used two experimental research settings related to service failure and service recovery. Using Qualtrics.com, 377 participants were recruited, and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), analysis of variance (ANOVA), and regression were conducted to test hypotheses. The results confirmed that the customers’ perceived justice and emotions differed across the service recovery types, and distributive and interactional justice differed significantly by service recovery type, whereas procedural justice did not differ significantly. Additionally, positive emotions differed significantly across the three types of service recovery, whereas negative emotions did not differ. The three dimensions of perceived justice as well as positive and negative emotions were found to be significant predictors of post-recovery satisfaction. This study also found moderating effect of service failure severity, but the service recovery expectations had no moderating effects on either the relationships between perceived justice and post-recovery satisfaction or the relationships between emotions and post-recovery satisfaction. The service failure severity has a significant effect on service recovery expectations. These results imply that marketers must differentiate their service recovery strategies, emphasizing not only the physical format but also the manner of service recovery. In particular, this study ascertained the importance of an apology to determine customers’ perceptions of justice and emotions. This strategic approach, which focuses on the sincere manner of service recovery, such as apologies, would be more cost effective than monetary compensation. This study also empirically confirms the importance of customers’ affective responses to service recovery as much as their cognitive responses. The strategic importance of the customers’ affective responses, particularly their negative emotions, was also significantly addressed in the results of the moderating effects of the service failure severity. Thus, marketers should particularly understand how severely customers have perceived their service failures to be when formulating service recovery strategies that meet customer demands.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectService failure
dc.subjectService recovery
dc.subjectPerceived justice
dc.subjectEmotions
dc.subjectSatisfaction
dc.subjectService failure severity
dc.subjectService recovery expectations
dc.subjectOnline apparel retailing
dc.subjectSocial exchange theory
dc.subjectEquity theory
dc.subjectDisconfirmation paradigm
dc.titleCognitive and affective antecedents of satisfaction with service recovery in online apparel retailing
dc.title.alternativea comparison of service recovery activities
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.description.departmentTextiles, Merchandising, and Interiors
dc.description.majorTextile Sciences
dc.description.advisorYoo-Kyoung Seock
dc.description.committeeYoo-Kyoung Seock
dc.description.committeeSoyoung Kim
dc.description.committeeJan Hathcote
dc.description.committeeBrenda Cude


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record