Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLiu, Tingting
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-27T04:31:07Z
dc.date.available2015-10-27T04:31:07Z
dc.date.issued2015-05
dc.identifier.otherliu_tingting_201505_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/liu_tingting_201505_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/33161
dc.description.abstractA key question in mergers and acquisitions (M&As) is whether the transactions are fair. A common practice is to ask a financial advisor to evaluate the fair value of a transaction and provide a fairness opinion. Using manually compiled data on a large sample over the period 1996-2011, I explore the decision to solicit fairness opinions by firms in M&As to identify the wealth effects associated with this choice. Inconsistent with prior studies, my results show that after controlling for endogeneity, the use of fairness opinions does not harm shareholders’ wealth. In contrast, I find evidence of a positive treatment effect for the use of fairness opinions on both the bidder and the target side. Overall, my results suggest that firms obtain fairness opinions for incremental information.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightsOn Campus Only Until 2017-05-01
dc.subjectMergers and acquisitions
dc.subjectFinancial advisor
dc.subjectFairness opinions
dc.subjectShareholders’ wealth
dc.titleEssays on mergers and acquisitions
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.description.departmentBusiness Administration
dc.description.majorBusiness Administration
dc.description.advisorHarold Mulherin
dc.description.committeeHarold Mulherin
dc.description.committeeJuan Wu
dc.description.committeeJeffry Netter
dc.description.committeeStuart Gillan


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record