Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRewa, Oleksa
dc.contributor.authorVilleneuve, Pierre-Marc
dc.contributor.authorEurich, Dean T
dc.contributor.authorStelfox, Henry T
dc.contributor.authorGibney, RT N
dc.contributor.authorHartling, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorFeatherstone, Robin
dc.contributor.authorBagshaw, Sean M
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-01T17:16:51Z
dc.date.available2015-09-01T17:16:51Z
dc.date.issued2015-07-30
dc.identifier.citationSystematic Reviews. 2015 Jul 30;4(1):102
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0088-1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/31765
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Renal replacement therapy is increasingly utilized in the intensive care unit (ICU), of which continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is most common. Despite CRRT being a relatively resource-intensive and expensive technology, there remains wide practice variation in its application. This systematic review will appraise the evidence for quality indicators (QIs) of CRRT care in critically ill patients. Methods Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and databases from the National Information Center of Health Services Research and Health Care Technology will be searched for original studies involving QIs in CRRT. Gray literature sources will be searched for technical reports, practice guidelines, and conference proceedings. Websites of relevant organizations will be identified, and industry leaders in the development and marketing of CRRT technology and non-profit organizations that represent key opinion leads in the use of CRRT will be contacted. We will search the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality National Quality Measures Clearinghouse for CRRT-related QIs. Studies will be included if they contain quality measures, occur in critically ill patients, and are associated with CRRT. Analysis will be primarily descriptive. Each QI will be evaluated for importance, scientific acceptability, usability, and feasibility using the four criteria proposed by the United States Strategic Framework Board for a National Quality Measurement and Reporting System. Finally, QIs will be appraised for their potential operational characteristics, for their potential to be integrated into electronic medical records, and on their affordability, if applicable. Discussion This systematic review will comprehensively identify and synthesize QIs in CRRT. The results of this study will fuel the development of an inventory of essential QIs to support the appropriate, safe, and efficient delivery of CRRT in critically ill patients. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42015015530.
dc.titleQuality indicators in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) care in critically ill patients: protocol for a systematic review
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.date.updated2015-07-29T18:26:38Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderRewa et al.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record