Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCruickshank, David
dc.contributor.authorLefaivre, Kelly A
dc.contributor.authorJohal, Herman
dc.contributor.authorMacIntyre, Norma J
dc.contributor.authorSprague, Sheila A
dc.contributor.authorScott, Taryn
dc.contributor.authorGuy, Pierre
dc.contributor.authorCripton, Peter A
dc.contributor.authorMcKee, Michael
dc.contributor.authorBhandari, Mohit
dc.contributor.authorSlobogean, Gerard P
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-01T16:58:00Z
dc.date.available2015-09-01T16:58:00Z
dc.date.issued2015-07-30
dc.identifier.citationBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2015 Jul 30;16(1):175
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0627-x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/31691
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Fixation failure is a relatively common sequela of surgical management of proximal humerus fractures (PHF). The purpose of this study is to understand the current state of the literature with regard to the biomechanical testing of proximal humerus fracture implants. Methods A scoping review of the proximal humerus fracture literature was performed, and studies testing the mechanical properties of a PHF treatment were included in this review. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the characteristics and methods of the included studies. Results 1,051 proximal humerus fracture studies were reviewed; 67 studies met our inclusion criteria. The most common specimen used was cadaver bone (87 %), followed by sawbones (7 %) and animal bones (4 %). A two-part fracture pattern was tested most frequently (68 %), followed by three-part (23 %), and four-part (8 %). Implants tested included locking plates (52 %), intramedullary devices (25 %), and non-locking plates (25 %). Hemi-arthroplasty was tested in 5 studies (7 %), with no studies using reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) implants. Torque was the most common mode of force applied (51 %), followed by axial loading (45 %), and cantilever bending (34 %). Substantial testing diversity was observed across all studies. Conclusions The biomechanical literature was found to be both diverse and heterogeneous. More complex fracture patterns and RTSA implants have not been adequately tested. These gaps in the current literature will need to be addressed to ensure that future biomechanical research is clinically relevant and capable of improving the outcomes of challenging proximal humerus fracture patterns.
dc.titleA scoping review of biomechanical testing for proximal humerus fracture implants
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.date.updated2015-07-29T18:14:43Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderCruickshank et al.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record