Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHou, Xu
dc.contributor.authorHu, Dan
dc.contributor.authorCui, Zhili
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Jian
dc.contributor.authorCai, Li
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yusheng
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-31T13:43:18Z
dc.date.available2015-08-31T13:43:18Z
dc.date.issued2015-07-29
dc.identifier.citationBMC Ophthalmology. 2015 Jul 29;15(1):88
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0074-3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/31603
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Acute primary angle closure (PAC) can be refractory to conventional treatment and intraocular pressure (IOP) is beyond control. Surgical intervention should be considered at the moment. The aim of the study was to compare small-incision phacotrabeculectomy (phacotrab, small-incision trabeculectomy combined with phacoemulsification) with phacoemulsification (phaco) in patients with refractory acute PAC and coexisting cataract. Methods Analyzed 49 eyes (49 patients) with acute PAC and cataract received small-incision phacotrab (24 eyes) or phaco (25 eyes) randomly. All these cases were refractory to conventional treatment involved the use of preoperative topical IOP-lowering agents, corticosteroids, mannitol, methazolamide and paracentesis to reduce IOP. The effects on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), IOP, anterior chamber depth (ACD), glaucoma medications, and complications were observed for twelve months. Results After operation BCVA of 18 patients (75 %) in phacotrab group and 20 patients (80 %) in phaco group improved compared to preoperative vision. No statistically significant differences in mean BCVA were found between the two groups. The mean postoperative IOP levels at all follow up time points were lower than the mean preoperative IOP in each group (P <0.001). There was statistically significant difference in mean IOP between the two groups only at 12 months postoperatively (P = 0.006). The surgical success rate (without medications, IOP ≤ 21 mmHg) was 83.33 % (20 eyes) and 72 % (18 eyes) in phacotrab group and phaco group respectively at 12 months. No statistically significant differences in the mean ACD were found between the two groups. There were no serious intra- or post-operative complications in the two treatment groups. Conclusions Besides phaco, small incision phacotrab may be another effective and safe choice in the treatment of patients with refractory acute PAC and coexisting cataract. Whether phacotrab is more effective in IOP control in the long term needs to be verified in the further.
dc.titleSmall-incision phacotrabeculectomy versus phacoemulsification in refractory acute primary angle closure with cataract
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.date.updated2015-07-29T17:56:08Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderHou et al.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record