• Login
    View Item 
    •   Athenaeum Home
    • BioMed Central Open Access Articles
    • Open Access Articles by UGA Faculty
    • View Item
    •   Athenaeum Home
    • BioMed Central Open Access Articles
    • Open Access Articles by UGA Faculty
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Global timber investments and trends, 2005-2011

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    1179-5395-44-S1-S7.xml (85.61Kb)
    1179-5395-44-S1-S7.pdf (613.5Kb)
    1179-5395-44-S1-S7-S1.xlsx (26.76Kb)
    1179-5395-44-S1-S7-S2.xlsx (14.64Kb)
    1179-5395-44-S1-S7-S3.xlsx (13.86Kb)
    1179-5395-44-S1-S7-S4.xlsx (12.93Kb)
    1179-5395-44-S1-S7-S5.xlsx (12.13Kb)
    1179-5395-44-S1-S7-S6.xlsx (11.86Kb)
    1179-5395-44-S1-S7-S7.xlsx (12.33Kb)
    Date
    2014-11-26
    Author
    Cubbage, Frederick
    Mac Donagh, Patricio
    Balmelli, Gustavo
    Morales Olmos, Virginia
    Bussoni, Adriana
    Rubilar, Rafael
    De La Torre, Rafael
    Lord, Roger
    Huang, Jin
    Afonso Hoeflich, Vitor
    Murara, Mauro
    Kanieski, Bruno
    Hall, Peter
    Yao, Richard
    Adams, Paul
    Kotze, Heyns
    Monges, Elizabeth
    Hernández Pérez, Carmelo
    Wikle, Jeff
    Abt, Robert
    Gonzalez, Ronalds
    Carrero, Omar
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Abstract Background Prior research in 2005 and 2008 estimated planted forest investment returns for a set of countries and included some natural forest species in a few countries. This research has extended those analyses to a larger set of countries and focused on plantation species, for seven years. This research serves as a "benchmarking" exercise that helps identify comparative advantages among countries for timber investment returns, as well as other institutional, forestry, and policy factors that affect investments. Furthermore, it extends the analyses to examine the effects of land prices, environmental regulations, and increased productivity on timber investment returns, as well as comparing timber returns with traditional stock market returns. Methods We estimated financial returns in 2005, 2008, and 2011 for a range of global timber plantation species and countries, using net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and Land Expectation Value (LEV)--or the Faustmann Formula--as criteria. Per the Faustmann approach, we excluded land costs initially, using a common real discount rate of 8% for all species in all countries to make equivalent comparisons. Results Returns for exotic plantations in almost all of South America--Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Venezuela, and Paraguay--were substantial, as well as in China. In 2011, returns for Eucalyptus species were generally greater than those for Pinus species in each country, with most having IRRs of 14% per year or more. The IRRs for Pinus species in South America were slightly less, ranging from 8% to 12%, except for Brazil, where they were 19% to 23%. Internal rates of return ranged from 5% to 12% for plantations of coniferous or deciduous species in China, South Africa, New Zealand, Australia, Mexico, and the United States. Although lower than returns from South America, these would still be attractive to forest investors. Land costs and environmental regulations reduced plantation investment returns for all the countries studied, but the largest reductions were observed in South America. However, net returns these remained greater than for plantations in temperate forests. Conclusions Trend analyses indicated that Brazil had the greatest increase in timber investment returns during the period examined; returns in other southern hemisphere countries remained fairly stable; and the US South had substantial decreases in returns. New Zealand, Australia, the United States, Chile, and Mexico had the best rankings regarding risk from political, commercial, or government actions and for the ease of doing business. Conversely, Venezuela, Colombia, and Argentina had high risk ratings, and Brazil and Venezuela were ranked as more difficult countries for ease of business. Recent government actions in several countries in South America, except Colombia, have discouraged foreign investments in agricultural land, which has adversely affected forestry as well. Timber-land investments fared well in comparison to USA equity or debt annual returns from 2000 to 2011. Past timber-land investors appear to making excellent returns now based on cheap land costs decades ago; new investments in most countries and plantation species will have smaller rates of return, but still compare favourably with traditional asset classes.
    URI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1179-5395-44-S1-S7
    http://hdl.handle.net/10724/30827
    Collections
    • Open Access Articles by UGA Faculty

    About Athenaeum | Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of AthenaeumCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About Athenaeum | Contact Us | Send Feedback