Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorProctor, Christina Dawn
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-24T04:30:10Z
dc.date.available2014-10-24T04:30:10Z
dc.date.issued2014-05
dc.identifier.otherproctor_christina_d_201405_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/proctor_christina_d_201405_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/30599
dc.description.abstractWithin the past decade, overall prevalence of legal and illegal drug use has decreased, but the use of alcohol and other drugs during adolescence remains a current public health problem. Among rural youth, alcohol and other drug use increased over the past decade. Past research on contextual factors influencing drug use revealed that protective factors in the community, school, and home all interact to influence youth drug use; however, these studies lack information about the casual pathways and interactions of protective factors and their role in preventing drug use. Few studies have examined school connectedness as a mediator between contextual factors and drug use. In addition, research in rural areas is lacking, and those studies focusing on adolescents in rural areas often do not account for moderating effects of demographic variables, cultural influences, community connectedness, and the influence of religion. The current study examined a structural model based on an ecological framework to determine how protective factors deter rural adolescent substance use and promote school connectedness. Structural equation modeling was utilized to analyze the relation between these constructs. Data were collected from a convenience sample of middle and high schools from three rural school districts in Georgia. Paper-and-pencil surveys were used to collect data from 1059 students. Results provide evidence that contextual factors from the individual, family/peer, school, and community level all directly or indirectly influence rural adolescent drug use, but individual and school variables play the largest role in preventing rural adolescent substance use. In particular, refusal efficacy and social norms were significant protective factors for all types of substance use. School connectedness was the third strongest protective factor for all substance use and mediated the relation between many contextual factors and substance use. Contextual factors from all levels of the socio-ecological framework have differing effects based on type of drug use, race, gender, and age. Discussion of the study results includes implications for future research and practice.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectAdolescents
dc.subjectTeens
dc.subjectRural
dc.subjectSubstance use
dc.subjectSchool connectedness
dc.subjectSocial ecological framework
dc.subjectTheory of Planned Behavior
dc.subjectProblem Behavior Theory
dc.subjectSocial Disorganization Theory
dc.subjectStructural equation modeling
dc.subjectMediation
dc.subjectModeration
dc.subjectPath analysis
dc.titleDirect effects and interactions of individual characteristics, peers, parents, schools, and community influences on rural adolescent substance use and school connectedness
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.description.departmentHealth Promotion and Behavior
dc.description.majorHealth Promotion and Behavior
dc.description.advisorJessica Muilenburg
dc.description.committeeJessica Muilenburg
dc.description.committeePamela Orpinas
dc.description.committeeZhenqiu Lu
dc.description.committeeBrian Bride


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record