Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcDowell, Kristy Marie Segal
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-09T04:30:21Z
dc.date.available2014-10-09T04:30:21Z
dc.date.issued2014-05
dc.identifier.othermcdowell_kristy_m_201405_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/mcdowell_kristy_m_201405_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/30542
dc.description.abstractDestruction of natural wetlands is among the largest threats to amphibians. While artificial wetlands have been proposed as a surrogate habitat for displaced amphibians, this has never been rigorously tested in the field. Artificial wetlands expose amphibians to many potential stressors, including pesticides. We assessed variables at the community, population, and individual levels for amphibians in artificial wetlands along a gradient of pesticide exposure in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Our objective was to determine if pesticide exposure predicted measureable differences in health, population density, and community composition. We did this by assessing the general amphibian community and by a more in-depth study of one species, Rhinella marina. The community study detected thirteen species through call sampling and capture. Community composition was similar among sites, but sites with high pesticide application rates had lower community similarity through time. Higher population densities were associated with lower pesticide application rates for two species. Variable species responses are likely due to differences in life history. Pesticides significantly predicted body condition for one of the six species assessed, Leptodactylus fragilis, with higher body condition associated with lower pesticide application rates. For Rhinella marina, pesticide application rate significantly predicted the presence of insect head capsules in toad gut contents. Pesticide application rate also significantly predicted infection intensity for several parasites: Rhabdias nematodes, intestinal trematodes, haemogregarines, and microfilaria. Higher haemogregarine burdens were associated with higher pesticide application rates, while burdens for the other three parasites showed the opposite trend. All individuals tested were negative for Bd and ranavirus. Taken together, this study suggests that pesticide exposure may be important for amphibians, but importance varies among species. Contrary to expectations, Rhinella marina from high pesticide sites were not immunosuppressed. Lower infection intensities of several important parasite species may result in overall better health in sites with higher pesticide application rates. However, lower population densities and species loss from the communities in higher pesticide sites indicate that pesticides could negatively affecting amphibians in other ways. More research is needed to determine the cause of these community level changes, and to make management recommendations to improve artificial wetlands as amphibian habitat.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectCane toad
dc.subjectAmphibian
dc.subjectPesticide
dc.subjectCosta Rica
dc.subjectEcoimmunology
dc.subjectEcotoxicology
dc.titleExamining the relationship of pesticides and amphibians in Costa Rican artificial wetlands
dc.title.alternativefrom individuals to communities
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.description.departmentInstitute of Ecology
dc.description.majorEcology
dc.description.advisorSonia Hernandez
dc.description.advisorRon Carroll
dc.description.committeeSonia Hernandez
dc.description.committeeRon Carroll
dc.description.committeeMichael Yabsley
dc.description.committeeAlan Covich
dc.description.committeeRobert B. Bringolf


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record