Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBundy, Jonathan Nicholas
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-07T04:30:18Z
dc.date.available2014-08-07T04:30:18Z
dc.date.issued2014-05
dc.identifier.otherbundy_jonathan_n_201405_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/bundy_jonathan_n_201405_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/30343
dc.description.abstractI examine how a firm’s multiple reputations influence managers’ and stakeholders’ reactions to a negative violation. Specifically, I investigate how a firm’s financial and social reputations, as well as its overall general reputation, serve potentially conflicting roles for two types of organizational violations: financial restatements and environmental malfeasance. In the context of financial restatements, I find that a firm’s social reputation encourages managers to provide a more accommodative response to the violation, while its general reputation discourages managers from being accommodative. I also find that being accommodative positively influences each of a firm’s three reputations as outcomes in a financial violation context. In the context of environmental malfeasance, I find that a firm’s social and financial reputations encourage managers to provide an accommodative response, while its general reputation discourages managers from being accommodative. I also find that being accommodative negatively influences a firm’s social and general reputations as outcomes in the social violation context. Ultimately, I show that reputation repair is a complex and dynamic process and that a firm’s multiple reputations often act as conflicting rather than complementary assets. In doing so, I advance organizational research in several related areas, including reputation management, stakeholder management, and social evaluations.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectFirm Reputation
dc.subjectReputation Repair
dc.subjectNegative Violation
dc.titleReputations in flux
dc.title.alternativeexamining how a firm's multiple reputations influence reactions to a negative violation
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.description.departmentManagement
dc.description.majorBusiness Administration
dc.description.advisorMichael Pfarrer
dc.description.committeeMichael Pfarrer
dc.description.committeeChristine Shropshire
dc.description.committeeScott Graffin


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record