Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorButtin, Sandrine
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-05T16:03:49Z
dc.date.available2014-03-05T16:03:49Z
dc.date.issued2002-08
dc.identifier.otherbuttin_sandrine_200208_ms
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/buttin_sandrine_200208_ms
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/29505
dc.description.abstractThis thesis compares the rules of jurisdiction applicable to multinational corporations within two legal systems. The Anglo-American system favors forum non conveniens, whereas, the European applies European Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001. The difference between the two approaches permits litigants to practice forum shopping. The focus of the paper is to give an overview of the two approaches and to contrast them.
dc.languageMultinational corporations facing the varying concepts of jurisdiction : "forum non-conveniens", contrasts between the Anglo-American and the European law systems
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectJurisdiction
dc.subjectmultinational corporation
dc.subjectforum non conveniens
dc.subjectEuropean Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001
dc.subjectforum shopping
dc.titleMultinational corporations facing the varying concepts of jurisdiction : "forum non-conveniens", contrasts between the Anglo-American and the European law systems
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.degreeMS
dc.description.departmentSchool of Law
dc.description.majorLaw
dc.description.advisorGabriel Wilner
dc.description.committeeGabriel Wilner
dc.description.committeeFrederick W. Huszagh


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record