Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorScott, Ryan Patrick Joseph
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T22:00:05Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T22:00:05Z
dc.date.issued2002-08
dc.identifier.otherscott_ryan_200208_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/scott_ryan_200208_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/29307
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between Family Structure in the family of origin with the development of later male gender roles. To date, no studies had assessed the relationship between family structure as first identified by Minuchin (1974) and the development of male gender roles. This is despite the wide agreement in the literature on the importance of further understanding the relationship between male gender role development and family dynamics. The present study was an attempt to address this lack of empirical examination of current theories on male development in the family by studying the relationship between the family of origin with male gender role development. Specifically, the variables of family structure first highlighted by Minuchin’s (1974) Structural Family Therapy were examined in relation to dimensions of Male Gender Role Conflict (O’Neil, 1981) and Conformity to Masculine Norms (Mahalik, 2000). This study assessed 1) the relationship between males’ retrospective perceptions of their family structure (disengagement, rigidity, conflict avoidance, and triangulation/ coalition) with Male Gender Role Conflict and Conformity to Masculine Norms, and 2) the relationship between perceptions of the mother/ child cohesion and father/ child cohesion growing up with Male Gender Role Conflict and Conformity to Masculine Norms. Participants (N=135) were male undergraduate students at a large public university in the southeast region of the United States. The current study offered additional insight into how the family of origin may influence male gender role development. Overall, the results indicated that levels of family disengagement and conflict avoidance patterns were among the best family structure predictors of male gender role conformity and male gender role conflict. The analyses also implicated the level of cohesion with mother in the development of conformity to masculine norms and cohesion with both parents in male gender role conflict development. Implications for future research and practice are offered.
dc.languageThe relationship between family structure and male gender role development
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectFamily structure
dc.subjectMales
dc.subjectDisengagement
dc.subjectConflict avoidance
dc.subjectCohesion
dc.subjectGender role development
dc.subjectGender role conflict
dc.subjectConformity to masculine norms
dc.subjectGender roles
dc.titleThe relationship between family structure and male gender role development
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.description.departmentCounseling and Human Development Services
dc.description.majorCounseling Psychology
dc.description.advisorArthur M. Horne
dc.description.committeeArthur M. Horne
dc.description.committeeGeorgia Calhoun
dc.description.committeeJames Calhoun
dc.description.committeeBrian Glaser
dc.description.committeeRuperto Perez


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record