Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJaju, Anupam
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T21:58:59Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T21:58:59Z
dc.date.issued2002-08
dc.identifier.otherjaju_anupam_200208_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/jaju_anupam_200208_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/29207
dc.description.abstractFor the past several years, there has been an increasing trend of a phenomenon in which firms decide to change their identities by redeploying their corporate or product brand names. These brand name redeployments, resulting from a merger or an acquisition deal occur in a variety of different approaches ranging from elimination of one brand, to concatenation of the brand names. The frequency and costs involved in these redeployment processes are exorbitantly high. In spite of these high stakes, the motives behind this corporate strategy are quite diverse, intriguing and, at times, vague. On one hand, researchers argue that brand name changes are a result of the firm’s strategic decision to leverage equity and/or “broaden the scope of business.” On the other hand, several theorists argue the motive on a rather selfish nature of the executive and/or the firm. Such variation in the firm’s strategic choice motivates this investigation. The objective of this study is to develop an understanding of the firm-, market- and transaction-specific antecedent factors that lead to these brand name redeployment decisions and subsequently, explore the consequences of this strategic action. This research uses the various theories of the firm relating to mergers and acquisitions (viz. Resource-based perspective, market and managerial power perspective, signaling theory etc.) and brand redeployments (brand extensions) to formulate a conceptual model of antecedent factors influencing the brand name redeployment decision. The impacts of these factors are ascertained through an empirical analysis conducted over a sample of about 656 merger or acquisition transactions during the 1995-1999 period. Finally this research also incorporates an exploratory analysis of the performance-based consequences of these redeployments. The results indicate that relative standing, market overlap between the acquirer and the target firm and the transactional characteristics of the merger or acquisition have a significant impact on the brand name redeployment decision.
dc.languageAntecendents and consequences of corporate brand name redeployment
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectBrand Management
dc.subjectBrand Redeployments
dc.subjectCorporate Brand Strategy,
dc.subjectMarket Overlap
dc.subjectMergers and Acquisitions
dc.subjectMultinomial Logistic Model
dc.subjectPower
dc.subjectRelative
dc.subjectStanding
dc.subjectResource-based theory
dc.subjectSignaling Theory.
dc.titleAntecendents and consequences of corporate brand name redeployment
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.description.departmentMarketing and Distribution
dc.description.majorBusiness Administration
dc.description.advisorSrinivas K. Reddy
dc.description.committeeSrinivas K. Reddy
dc.description.committeeAnn Buchholtz
dc.description.committeeCara Lee O. Peters
dc.description.committeeThomas Leigh
dc.description.committeeGeorge M. Zinkhan


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record