Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPatrick, Nicholas Michael
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T21:13:54Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T21:13:54Z
dc.date.issued2013-08
dc.identifier.otherpatrick_nicholas_m_201308_mhp
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/patrick_nicholas_m_201308_mhp
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/29146
dc.description.abstractThis thesis will compare the two major construction delivery systems in their application in preservation construction projects, Design-Build (DB) and Design-Bid-Build (DBB). Several factors of construction influence the choice of DB or DBB delivery systems. What are these factors, and how do they affect final products in the context of preservation construction? These factors will be determined and described based on the author’s personal experience working for Aeon Preservation Services, LLC. on two preservation projects. The projects, the restoration of original cast iron canopies at The Department of Veterans Affairs building and the stone façade restoration at the National Gallery of Art West Building, were both located in Washington, D.C. and are examples of DB and DBB. These projects will be analyzed and compared using case studies.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectHistoric preservation, Preservation construction, Construction, Construction management, Project delivery systems, Design-Build, Design-Bid-Build, The Veterans Affairs building, The National Gallery of Art West Building
dc.titlePreservation construction
dc.title.alternativeDesign-Build versus Design-Bid-Build
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.degreeMHP
dc.description.departmentCollege of Environment and Design
dc.description.majorHistoric Preservation
dc.description.advisorWayde Brown
dc.description.committeeWayde Brown
dc.description.committeeMark Reinberger
dc.description.committeeScott Messer


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record