Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCurrie, Lacy Kristen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T21:05:42Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T21:05:42Z
dc.date.issued2013-08
dc.identifier.othercurrie_lacy_k_201308_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/currie_lacy_k_201308_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/29015
dc.description.abstractGiven the alarming prevalence of college student suicides and the detrimental effects to the campus climate, recent literature has focused on preparing mental health professionals working within university counseling centers for detecting risks and adequately assessing for suicidality. Yet, very little, if any, attention has been given to exploring the relationship between a clinician’s previous experiences with suicide and their engagement in suicide assessment behaviors when working with suicidal clients. Thus, the primary purpose of the current study was to explore the relationship between clinicians’ previous experiences with suicide (i.e. suicide training, clinical experiences with suicide, and personal experiences with suicide) and their engagement in four core suicide assessment behaviors (i.e. completing a lethality screening, utilizing direct language, engaging in narrative dialogues related to suicide, and conducting routine reassessments of risk). Data was obtained from 107 mental heath professionals working in university counseling centers. All participants completed a survey assessing their previous experiences with suicide and engagement in suicide assessment behaviors. Frequencies of suicide experiences and suicide assessment behaviors were examined. In addition, a canonical correlation analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between suicide experiences and suicide assessment behaviors. The results indicated a significant relationship between previous experiences with suicide and suicide assessment behaviors, with personal experience being the most significant contributor and suicide training, acting as a minor, secondary contributor. Specifically, results revealed that individuals with more personal experience with suicide more often completed a lethality screening and engaged in narrative dialogues related to suicide, and less often used direct language. Results also revealed that individuals with more suicide training utilized direct language when discussing suicide more often, but completed lethality screenings and engaged in narrative dialogues about suicide with clients less often. Implications for clinical practice, education and training, and future research are discussed.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectSuicide
dc.subjectuniversity counseling center
dc.subjectsuicide assessment
dc.subjectsuicide experiences
dc.subjectpersonal experience with suicide
dc.subjectclinical experience with suicide
dc.subjectsuicide training
dc.subjectsuicide assessment behaviors
dc.subjectcanonical correlation analysis.
dc.titleThe relationship between experience with suicide and suicide assessment in university counseling centers
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.description.departmentCounseling and Human Development Services
dc.description.majorCounseling Psychology
dc.description.advisorLinda Campbell
dc.description.committeeLinda Campbell
dc.description.committeeChristopher Pisarik
dc.description.committeeBrian A. Glaser
dc.description.committeeGeorgia B. Calhoun


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record