Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMorelli, Neil Alexander
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T21:03:04Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T21:03:04Z
dc.date.issued2013-05
dc.identifier.othermorelli_neil_a_201305_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/morelli_neil_a_201305_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/28833
dc.description.abstractRecent usage data suggest job applicants are completing online selection assessments using mobile devices (e.g., Smartphones) in greater numbers. Advancements in mobile technology’s functionality, affordability, and mobility have quickly made mobile devices the medium of choice for accessing the Internet. Thus, these devices offer logistical advantages for organizations looking to extend their recruiting and selection efforts to a demographically and geographically wider range of potential job applicants. However, organizations must determine that the constructs predictive of future job performance are being measured similarly when applicants complete assessments using mobile devices. In an effort to replicate and extend previous findings on the utility of this new technology in a selection context, this study used two large, applied samples of job applicants in a hospitality organization to examine the measurement equivalence of selection assessments delivered on mobile and non-mobile devices (e.g., personal computers). Measurement invariance tests conducted with multi-group confirmatory factor analysis suggest that mobile versions of a cognitive ability-type assessment, two biodata assessments, a multimedia work simulation, and a text-based situational judgment test are equivalent to non-mobile versions at the configural, scalar, and residual variance level. The results also found that mobile device user latent means are approximately half a standard deviation lower than their non-mobile counterparts for the situational judgment test. Implications for technology-enhanced selection assessment at the practitioner and organizational levels are discussed.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectMeasurement equivalence
dc.subjectMeasurement invariance
dc.subjectMobile devices
dc.subjectSelection
dc.subjectAssessment
dc.subjectInternet-based testing
dc.subjectTechnology-enhanced assessment
dc.subjectCognitive ability
dc.subjectBiodata
dc.subjectWork simulations
dc.subjectSituational judgment test
dc.subjectComputerized testing
dc.titleEstablishing the measurement equivalence of online selection assessments delivered on mobile versus non-mobile devices
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.description.departmentPsychology
dc.description.majorPsychology
dc.description.advisorRobert Mahan
dc.description.committeeRobert Mahan
dc.description.committeeRobert Vandenberg
dc.description.committeeChuck Lance


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record