• Login
    View Item 
    •   Athenaeum Home
    • University of Georgia Theses and Dissertations
    • University of Georgia Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Athenaeum Home
    • University of Georgia Theses and Dissertations
    • University of Georgia Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Playing by the rules

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2013-05
    Author
    Dzubinski, Leanne Beaton Mason
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The purpose of this study was to understand how women lead and make meaning of their leadership in evangelical mission organizations. Three research questions guided this study. First, how have these women become leaders and learned to lead? Second, what if any forms of resistance or subversive behavior do they use in order to lead in a patriarchal culture? Third, how do they and the organizations they work in account for their leadership? Twelve women were purposefully selected for this study. I talked with each one for up to two hours, asking them to describe how they came to lead and to tell me stories of their successes and challenges. I also asked for their thoughts on why they were chosen to lead, and what it was like to be a woman leader in their organizations. After the first round of interviews, I conducted constant comparative analysis and asked for member-check feedback from the participants in a second round of interviews and correspondence. The first and second rounds of data analysis resulted in three categories of findings. The first finding was that the women, to a large extent, accept and follow evangelical faith’s prescribed gender-roles. The second finding was that they were also able, to some extent, to use or maneuver the gender roles to support their leadership. The third finding was that the organizations as well as the women themselves continue to be quite ambivalent about women’s leadership. Two conclusions emerged from the themes in this study. First, the power of the system’s structural inequality that favors men is a self-reinforcing system that the women cannot successfully resist. Second, due to their isolation and token status, the women wind up personalizing the problems they encounter. Implications for theory, practice, and further research are discussed in light of the findings and conclusions.
    URI
    http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/dzubinski_leanne_b_201305_phd
    http://hdl.handle.net/10724/28721
    Collections
    • University of Georgia Theses and Dissertations

    About Athenaeum | Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of AthenaeumCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About Athenaeum | Contact Us | Send Feedback