Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSeponski, Desiree Michele
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T20:22:34Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T20:22:34Z
dc.date.issued2011-08
dc.identifier.otherseponski_desiree_m_201108_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/seponski_desiree_m_201108_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/27589
dc.description.abstractIt is estimated that between 1.5 and 3 million Cambodians were killed between 1975-1979 as a result of the Khmer Rouge genocide. The victims were primarily highly educated individuals and their families, including government officials, doctors, lawyers, professors, teachers, and psychotherapists. As a result of the devastation, Cambodia is still struggling to educate its country and recover from the economic, political, and psychological damage caused by years of turmoil. The current climate is further complicated by the recent rise of an HIV/AIDS epidemic throughout the country, which has raised the death toll of the second generation of post-war survivors, leaving orphaned children to be raised by their older family members or to live on the streets. A project was developed to address the aforementioned crises by engaging Cambodian therapists at the Royal University of Phnom Penh (RUPP) in exploring a culturally responsive therapy model. With commitments to providing the community with improved mental health services, responding to stakeholder needs and issues, and creating an understanding of cultural sensitivity, responsiveness, and respect for Cambodian therapists and clients, this dissertation utilized responsive evaluation methodology to explore Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) as a culturally responsive model of Cambodian therapy. Data were triangulated across multiple stakeholders including EMDR trained students therapists (N =16), the RUPP department head, program head, professors/lecturers, clinical supervisors, and peer supervisors serving as cultural advocates and an advisory board (N =11), EMDR workshop participants (N=54), and Koh Pech crisis response therapists (N = 14) using numerous methods including a focus group, interviews, surveys, case illustrations, and live supervision observation. Qualitative and descriptive findings are mixed surrounding the clinical effectiveness of EMDR, yet converge on EMDR currently not being culturally responsive, but having future potential with serious adaptations. Emerging findings are discussed in detail and suggestions for improvement are provided.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectCambodian therapy
dc.subjectresponsive evaluation
dc.subjectEye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing
dc.subjectEMDR
dc.subjectculturally responsive therapy
dc.titleExploring Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) as a culturally responsive Cambodian model of therapy
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.description.departmentChild and Family Development
dc.description.majorChild and Family Development
dc.description.advisorDenise Lewis
dc.description.committeeDenise Lewis
dc.description.committeeDavid W. Wright
dc.description.committeeJ. Maria Bermudez


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record