Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRivkin, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T20:22:22Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T20:22:22Z
dc.date.issued2011-08
dc.identifier.otherrivkin_daniel_201108_ma
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/rivkin_daniel_201108_ma
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/27576
dc.description.abstractA judge's ideology is her set of ideas and principles and her view of how society should work, how power should be allocated, and to what ends it should be used. One way to measure judicial ideology is to find an indicator of a jurist’s preferences and isolate it from as many constraining factors as possible. Supreme Court justices are the least constrained of all jurists, particularly when writing non-majority opinions, and the citations they include in them provide a convenient unit of measurement. By determining the ideological polarity of each citation in a non-majority opinion in a concrete set of cases, I produce ideology scores for their authors within the legal fields to which those cases relate. I then compare these estimates with the justices’ Segal-Cover scores and median Martin-Quinn scores for that same period to determine their relative accuracy and usefulness in forecasting.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectSupreme Court Justices, Non-majority opinions, Ideology, Citation
dc.titleDistilling judicial ideology
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.degreeMA
dc.description.departmentPolitical Science
dc.description.majorPolitical Science
dc.description.advisorRichard L. Vining
dc.description.committeeRichard L. Vining
dc.description.committeeJohn A. Maltese
dc.description.committeeSusan B. Haire


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record