Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBenson, Bennett Isaiah
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T19:57:59Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T19:57:59Z
dc.date.issued2011-05
dc.identifier.otherbenson_bennett_i_201105_ma
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/benson_bennett_i_201105_ma
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/27057
dc.description.abstractThe proposed offshore Cape Wind Energy Project in Massachusetts would be the first of its kind in the United States. Activist groups have lobbied for and against this project since 2001. This research consists of a content analysis of activist groups’ master frames and online comments on Cape Wind news articles retrieved from The Boston Globe website. The most salient advocacy master frames concerned environmental benefits, like the production of clean energy, and political benefits, such as energy independence. The most salient opposition master frames regarded economic risks, primarily concerning an increase in the cost of electricity. Advocacy comments were recommended more often than opposition comments, although opposition comments appeared earlier in response to Cape Wind news articles than advocacy comments. Opposition comments containing aesthetic risks were recommended more often than other opposition comments.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectWind energy, Framing, Activist groups, Renewable energy, Not-in-my-backyard, Public relations, Online comments
dc.titleFraming the Massachusetts Cape Wind debate among active online publics
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.degreeMA
dc.description.departmentGrady College of Journalism and Mass Communication
dc.description.majorJournalism and Mass Communication
dc.description.advisorBryan Reber
dc.description.committeeBryan Reber
dc.description.committeeLynne Sallot
dc.description.committeeJeffrey Mullen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record