Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKolemen, Bedriye Aysuda
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T18:28:28Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T18:28:28Z
dc.date.issued2010-05
dc.identifier.otherkolemen_bedriye_a_201005_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/kolemen_bedriye_a_201005_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/26377
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation focuses on the everyday discourses on the welfare state in Germany, Sweden and the USA to explore the link between welfare regimes and national political cultures. It utilizes focus group discussions and Q studies to locate these discourses. In the focus group discussions, participants debate different aspects of the welfare state with each other. I analyze these discussions and contrast the patterns within and across national welfare cultures. For a more systematic and replicable comparison of discourses, I employ the Q method. I conduct two sets of Q studies (one unique for each country and the other identical across countries). In these studies, respondents are asked to rank the given statements according to their level of agreement or disagreement. Statements for the unique Q studies are drawn from the focus group discussions, and statements for the standard Q study are drawn from international public opinion surveys. I factor-analyze the responses to locate the groups of arguments that cluster together to form rival discourses. The discourses that emerge from the analysis of the unique (country-specific) statements produce stark differences that parallel the welfare regime institutions of the respective nations and support the main hypothesis of this study. The implications of these findings for the study of the relationship between political institutions and discourses are discussed.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectwelfare state
dc.subjectwelfare regimes
dc.subjectdiscourse
dc.subjectpublic opinion
dc.subjectQ method
dc.subjectfocus groups
dc.subjectdeservingness
dc.subjectpost-industrial nations
dc.subjectdiscursive institutionalism
dc.subjectGermany
dc.subjectSweden
dc.subjectUSA
dc.subjectcomparative politics
dc.titleWorlds of welfare discourse
dc.title.alternativea case study of Germany, Sweden and the USA
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.description.departmentInternational Affairs
dc.description.majorPolitical Science
dc.description.advisorChristopher Allen
dc.description.committeeChristopher Allen
dc.description.committeeMaurits Van deR Veen
dc.description.committeeCrepaz Markus
dc.description.committeeJeffrey Berejikian


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record