Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClarke, Geraldine
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T18:27:16Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T18:27:16Z
dc.date.issued2010-05
dc.identifier.otherclarke_geraldine_201005_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/clarke_geraldine_201005_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/26279
dc.description.abstractThe program planning process is an area of practice where the use of knowledge and power reconstructs or perpetuates a system in which some people are privileged and others disadvantaged. The purpose of this study was to understand how power relations shaped welfare-to-work employment training programs for African American public housing residents. Three research questions guided the study: (a) How do relationships of power shape whose interests are represented in the planning process? (b) How are planners’ interests negotiated in the planning process, and (c) How are planners’ interests expressed in specific features of the training program? Data for this study were collected by using interviews, documents, and observations. The multisite design involved two housing authorities, where 15 people were interviewed. Data analysis was completed using the constant comparative method. Data were analyzed separately for each authority’s welfare-to-work employment training program and a comparison of commonalities and differences was explored to determine whose interests mattered in the program planning process. Analysis of the data revealed that (a) stakeholders’ power is relational and multi-dimensional (b) specific program features represent the interests of stakeholders with the most power, and (c) program outcomes maintain organizational power and interests. Both executive directors in this study acknowledged that they were the most important person at the table in planning welfare-to-work employment training programs. These executive directors used their leadership (position) power to negotiate organizational and personal interests so that they not only planned and implemented successful programs to benefit the adult resident learner but also placed their authorities as leaders in the public housing industry. Three major conclusions were drawn from findings of the study. First, racism intersects with other social and organizational hierarchies to shape planning of welfare-to-work employment training programs. Second, learners’ voices in the planning process were overshadowed by those with greater power, affecting the development of employment training programs. Third, employment training programs reproduced the political dynamics of the welfare-to-work system by focusing the problem on welfare recipients.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectAdult Education Program Planning
dc.subjectDepartment of Housing and Urban Development
dc.subjectPoverty
dc.subjectPublic Housing
dc.subjectRace
dc.subjectRacial Discrimination
dc.subjectRacism
dc.subjectStereotypes, Welfare Racism, Welfare Social Policy
dc.subjectWelfare-to-Work Employment Training Programs
dc.titleWhat really matters in planning welfare-to-work employment training
dc.title.alternativea case study of programs for African American public housing residents
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.description.departmentLifelong Education, Administration, and Policy
dc.description.majorAdult Education
dc.description.advisorRonald M. Cervero
dc.description.committeeRonald M. Cervero
dc.description.committeeJuanita Johnson-Bailey
dc.description.committeeTalmadge Guy


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record