Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCannon, Monica
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T18:27:06Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T18:27:06Z
dc.date.issued2010-05
dc.identifier.othercannon_monica_y_201005_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/cannon_monica_y_201005_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/26264
dc.description.abstractA focus on over-industrialization of Western society has wrought a host of intertwined and impending changes to people and the planet. Sustainability advocates look to the U.S. education system, notably American business schools which help develop business ideology, to participate in aligning sustainability principles with goals of the modern corporation. Educators inside and outside of management argue, however, just how progressive and aggressive they should be in introducing sustainability within the organizational scheme of management education. Using the Cervero and Wilson (1994, 2006) planning theory for adult education programming, the purpose of this study was to examine the program planning processes of U.S. business professors and administrators initiating, creating, and teaching sustainability programs in U.S. MBA business school programs. The following questions form the basis of the research: (1) What are the social and institutional mechanisms that constrain or enable the planning of sustainability programs or courses by business school faculty and administrators? (2) How do sustainability program planners identify stakeholders that affect the direction of their program or courses? (3) How do business school faculty and administrative planners negotiate the power and interests they encounter in planning? This study was conducted using one-on-one interviews with academic planners from selected U.S. business schools. Inductive and deductive qualitative research strategies were used for analyzing research using the constant comparative method to analyze transcribed interview data in order to develop a cogent understanding of sustainability planners’ experiences. The research verified that sustainability has taken root in pockets of business schools where a few planners have established educational communities for advancing special curriculum and projects. Thus, this study proposes the following conclusions as a basis for a final discussion of the data: (1) Sustainability was an organizational innovation for which planners adopted either a revolutionary or incremental planning stance in order to achieve certain degrees of emancipatory change; (2) Planners’ long-term intrinsic motivation and positional capital were central to continuing and strengthening sustainability’s progress through the business school; (3) Planners’ efforts to negotiate support, resources, information and knowledge varied based on the degree of administrator, faculty and external involvement and cooperation.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectAdult education
dc.subjectBusiness schools
dc.subjectCorporate sustainability
dc.subjectCurriculum design
dc.subjectEmancipatory education
dc.subjectManagement education
dc.subjectPedagogy
dc.subjectProgram planning theory
dc.subjectMBA
dc.subjectSustainability
dc.titleGoing beyond compliance
dc.title.alternativeexamination of sustainability education planning practices in U.S. MBA business school programs
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.description.departmentLifelong Education, Administration, and Policy
dc.description.majorAdult Education
dc.description.advisorLaura L. Bierema
dc.description.committeeLaura L. Bierema
dc.description.committeeJuanita Johnson-Bailey
dc.description.committeeRonald M. Cervero
dc.description.committeeAnn Buchholtz


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record