Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLittlefield, Thomas Lucas
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T18:19:42Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T18:19:42Z
dc.date.issued2009-08
dc.identifier.otherlittlefield_thomas_l_200908_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/littlefield_thomas_l_200908_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/25867
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation investigates various aspects of the U.S. offshore crude oil and natural gas production market. In the first essay, I investigate whether energy firms producing U.S. offshore oil and natural gas benefit from the volatility of crude oil prices. Lease rights to offshore oil and natural gas production in the U.S. are determined through auctions in which the leases, at least in part, do not respond to changes in the price of oil. The leasing process precludes the possibility of contracts perfectly extracting all rent at any point in time. My results however suggest that contracts, despite their lack of responsiveness to changes in the price of crude, have on average done a good job extracting rent over time. In the second essay, I investigate the profitability of a sample of international oil companies and find that real profits of these oil companies display unit root behavior. One theory, the persistence in profit hypothesis, presumes this finding to indicate the existence of market power. Using a simple model of supply and demand I show that this implication may not hold. I propose an alternative test to ascertain whether barriers to entry exist within the U.S. offshore oil and natural gas production industry. The test suggests that offshore oil and gas production is competitive, which is contrary to public and main stream media opinion. Most importantly, this study produces a viable alternative to the persistence in profits method. In the last essay, I conduct a natural experiment to determine the effect of the windfall profit tax (1980-1988) on the U.S. oil industry. I estimate marginal cost for a sample of international energy firms for both U.S. and foreign production. With these estimates I then conduct a difference in differences experiment to determine the effect of the windfall profit tax on several indicators of domestic investment and production. The results of this experiment suggest that the windfall profit tax had little effect in terms of relative importance.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectFirm Efficiency
dc.subjectU.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Industry
dc.subjectImperfect Competition
dc.subjectProfit
dc.subjectCost Functions
dc.subjectUnit Root
dc.subjectWindfall Profit Tax
dc.titleEssays on the U.S. oil and natural gas industry
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.description.departmentEconomics
dc.description.majorEconomics
dc.description.advisorWilliam D. Lastrapes
dc.description.committeeWilliam D. Lastrapes
dc.description.committeeGeorge Selgin
dc.description.committeeScott Atkinson


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record