Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJones, Emily Marie
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T18:19:17Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T18:19:17Z
dc.date.issued2009-08
dc.identifier.otherjones_emily_m_200908_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/jones_emily_m_200908_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/25831
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to develop a survey instrument to measure parental perspectives of a) childhood obesity locus of control and b) solutions to childhood obesity. Such a measure could facilitate the design and development of childhood obesity related programs based upon the perspectives and values of parents, vital stakeholders in the lives and health of children. This study utilized a reiterative instrument development model proposed by Benson and Clark (1982) that involved a series of five pilot tests that provided initial qualitative and quantitative evidence of the reliability and validity of the instrument. A sample of 622 adults (75% 31-50 years; 90% parents) in the state of Georgia, United States, completed working versions of the newly developed instrument to assist in the establishment of content relevance, item clarity, and initial estimates of instrument reliability. The final questionnaire included 17 potential childhood obesity locus of control items that were placed on a five-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, strongly agree. The instrument also included 40 possible childhood obesity prevention strategies dually categorized by CDC Healthy People 2010 focus areas (CDC, 2000) and Social Ecological Model (Brofenbrenner, 1979) social levels. Respondents rank ordered groupings of the potential solutions in preference of support. Demographic information about the respondents’ age, sex, marital status, educational attainment, and parental status was collected. Instrument completion time was estimated to be 10 minutes. Exploratory factor analysis of these data revealed four childhood obesity locus of control factors (Internality, Chance-Externality, Powerful Others Outside the Home, and Powerful Others Inside the Home). These factors accounted for 46% of the total variance explained and held moderately strong alpha coefficients (range, .654 - .718). Descriptive statistics (M, SD, and mode) facilitated the analysis of rank order data of the solutions to obesity. Initial findings highlight participant propensity to support content specific prevention strategies implemented within stratified social levels. The result of this study is a newly developed instrument that measures perceptions of childhood obesity locus of control and solutions to childhood obesity.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectchildhood obesity
dc.subjectchildren
dc.subjectadolescents
dc.subjectinstrument development
dc.subjectinterventions
dc.subjectlocus of control
dc.subjectobesity prevention
dc.titleWhat do parents say about childhood obesity?
dc.title.alternativethe development and validation of a survey instrument to measure parent's perceptions of solutions to childhood obesity
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.description.departmentKinesiology
dc.description.majorPhysical Education and Sport Studies
dc.description.advisorPaul Schempp
dc.description.committeePaul Schempp
dc.description.committeeKaren Samuelsen
dc.description.committeeMike Orey
dc.description.committeeBryan McCullick


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record