Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAbad, Eli Joseph
dc.description.abstractWhile much attention has been paid to newspaper endorsements and their effects on vote choice, little attention has been paid to the endorsement process and the factors that editorial boards use when assessing candidates. This study develops a very basic theory and tests hypotheses that suggest editorial boards consider a number of candidate level factors during the endorsement process. Editorial behavior in the 2008 Republican and Democratic presidential nomination campaigns was the focus of this examination. Logistic regression analysis of the 2008 data suggests that both Democratic and Republican candidates trailing in national polls are less likely to accrue editorial support. For both models, ideological congruence between candidate and newspaper is the best explanatory variable for editorial choice. The more a candidate and a newspaper board agree on salient issues, the more likely that candidate will receive the newspaper’s endorsement. These findings suggest editorial choice is based on certain identifiable factors relating to the support levels and issue stances of the candidate. In other words, newspaper endorsements are generally quite predictable events.
dc.subjectPresidential Nomination Campaigns
dc.subjectNewspaper Endorsements
dc.subjectCandidate Viability
dc.subjectCandidate Quality
dc.subjectEditorial Boards
dc.titleThe calculus of editorial choice
dc.title.alternativean explanatory model of newspaper editorial board endorsements in the 2008 presidential nomination campaigns
dc.description.departmentPolitical Science
dc.description.majorPolitical Science
dc.description.advisorAudrey Haynes
dc.description.committeeAudrey Haynes
dc.description.committeeTeena Wilhelm
dc.description.committeePaul-Henri Gurian

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record