Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSohn, Youngsoon
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T18:17:17Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T18:17:17Z
dc.date.issued2009-05
dc.identifier.othersohn_youngsoon_200905_ma
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/sohn_youngsoon_200905_ma
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/25665
dc.description.abstractUsing three different theoretical frameworks – classical test theory, item response theory, and generalized linear model – this study analyzed items and searched for DIF on a nationwide English exam for students in the third grade of middle school in South Korea. The results from the three approaches were compared. For item analysis, the estimates of item difficulty and item discrimination were examined, and the correlations between indices for item parameters were calculated. The item parameter indices from classical test theory, item response theory, and generalized linear model behaved very similarly, and the correlations were high ranging from .882 to 1.0. Thus, the results of this study indicated that indices for item parameters under three different approaches are very comparable and may be substitutable for each other. Unlike item analysis, there were large differences in detecting DIF under the different frameworks. The IRTLR procedure for item response theory and the logistic regression model under generalized linear model were more general and flexible than the Mantel-Haneszel statistic in detecting DIF.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectClassical test theory
dc.subjectDifferential item functioning (DIF)
dc.subjectGeneralized linear model
dc.subjectItem analysis
dc.subjectItem difficulty
dc.subjectItem discrimination
dc.subjectItem response theory
dc.subjectLogistic regression
dc.subjectMantel-Haenszel statistic
dc.titleA comparison of methods for item analysis and DIF using classical test theory, item response theory, and generalized linear model
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.degreeMA
dc.description.departmentEducational Psychology and Instructional Technology
dc.description.majorEducational Psychology
dc.description.advisorSeock-Ho Kim
dc.description.committeeSeock-Ho Kim
dc.description.committeeJonathan Templin
dc.description.committeeKaren Samuelsen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record