Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLuckett, Robert Edward
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T18:15:59Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T18:15:59Z
dc.date.issued2009-05
dc.identifier.otherluckett_robert_e_200905_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/luckett_robert_e_200905_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/25550
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation focuses on Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi from 1956 until his death in office in 1969. As a prominent white politician in the Deep South, he was an outspoken segregationist. At the same time, he was a “man of the law.” As Attorney General, Patterson defended the legal implementations of Jim Crow in the state, but he also had to enforce federal law, as interpreted by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court. Those interpretations undermined segregation and black disfranchisement during Patterson’s four terms in office, which forced him to both defend and attack the foundations of Jim Crow. For his efforts, Patterson reaped criticism from each side of the civil rights movement. To the most adamant racists like Mississippi’s Governor, Ross Barnett, he was a traitor—a “Kennedy liberal” and the man responsible for James Meredith’s successful integration of the University of Mississippi. In fact, Patterson opposed Meredith’s admission with the full force of his office, but, once all legal barriers had been removed, he played a key, albeit unwanted, role in getting Meredith safely to Oxford. For those sympathetic to the civil rights movement, Patterson was a daunting foe. His ability to claim Barnett as a political enemy and his law-and-order record allowed him leeway in the eyes of the national media and the federal government, which made his brand of segregation quite effective. While Patterson claimed to enforce the letter of federal law, he forestalled its spirit through his dedication to a type of “color-blind” politics that explicitly ignored race as a determining factor but implicitly was all about the maintenance of white power. Difficult to define and undermine, his ideas were at the forefront of a burgeoning conservative movement throughout the nation. Rejecting racial demagogues and violence, the white voters of the state turned to Patterson in order to better forestall the encroachments of the civil rights movement.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectJoe T. Patterson
dc.subjectCivil Rights Movement
dc.subjectSegregation
dc.subjectDisfranchisement
dc.subjectRoss Barnett
dc.subjectPaul Johnson
dc.subjectJames P. Coleman
dc.subjectJohn McLaurin
dc.subjectMississippi
dc.subjectBrown v. Board of Education
dc.subjectCitizens’ Council
dc.subjectSovereignty Commission
dc.subjectErle Johnston
dc.subjectRobert Kennedy
dc.subjectJohn
dc.titleYapping dogs
dc.title.alternativeJoe T. Patterson and the limits of massive resistance
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.description.departmentHistory
dc.description.majorHistory
dc.description.advisorRobert Pratt
dc.description.committeeRobert Pratt
dc.description.committeeEdward Larson
dc.description.committeeJames Cobb
dc.description.committeeDerrick Alridge


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record