Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLang, Lisa Force
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T16:24:40Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T16:24:40Z
dc.date.issued2009-05
dc.identifier.otherlang_lisa_f_200905_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/lang_lisa_f_200905_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/25531
dc.description.abstractElementary teachers meet with challenges organizing instruction to differentiate for diverse learners writing in a new complex language. Building on sociocultural theories of learning, this qualitative multiple case study describes effective characteristics of instructional scaffolds between teachers and first-grade English language learners (ELL) within the context of Reading Recovery lessons, a well-researched early intervention program with documented effectiveness. Observations took place during conversation to compose and message writing components of lessons. Participants included three Reading Recovery teachers and six ELL. Digital video recordings, field notes, interviews, lesson records, and student artifacts collected for eighteen weeks comprised the data. Video and conversation analysis was used to elaborate the interactional details. A collection of interconnected yet stand-alone manuscripts details the findings. The first, “Vygotsky’s reflection “behind the glass”: Blending theory and practice in one-on-one writing instruction, discusses how Vygotsky’s sociocultural theories frame teaching and learning at the growing edges of students’ competencies. The second, “Interactions scaffolding hearing and recording sounds in words: A case study of an early intervention literacy teacher and an English language learner,” depicts how one teacher’s instructional scaffolding fostered a student’s self-regulation of a useful strategy to write new words. The third, “Expanding a meager knowledge of words for strategic actions in writing,” describes how a teacher scaffolded her student’s word learning journey. The fourth, “Using conversational analysis to examine writing instruction,” details the characteristics of effective conversations for composing to write. The fifth, “It looked like ice dancing: Orchestrating interactions that scaffold the writing of ELL,” identifies types of instructional assistance used to bridge actual development to potential development in students’ writing. Just as in paired ice skating, coordination of lifts and leaps requires intentions and collaboration of both partners. Teachers orchestrated instructional talk to foster independent strategic actions for emergent writers. While scaffolds do support learning, the characteristics of those scaffolds are critical for students to become self-regulated writers. Like ice dancing partners skate in tandem to support one another, the teachers’ scaffolding proved to be stronger when built contingent on individual student’s strengths.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectEnglish language learners
dc.subjectWriting
dc.subjectScaffolding
dc.subjectConversation
dc.subjectComposing
dc.subjectEarly literacy intervention
dc.subjectDifferentiated instruction
dc.subjectReading Recovery
dc.subjectSociocultural theory
dc.subjectVygotsky
dc.subjectConversation analysis
dc.subjectQualitative research
dc.subjectCase study
dc.titleIt looked like ice dancing
dc.title.alternativeorchestrating interactions that scaffold the writing of English language learners
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.description.departmentLanguage and Literacy Education
dc.description.majorEducation
dc.description.advisorLinda Labbo
dc.description.committeeLinda Labbo
dc.description.committeeMichelle Commeyras
dc.description.committeeJobeth Allen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record