Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmith, Marcy Lane
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T16:19:34Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T16:19:34Z
dc.date.issued2008-08
dc.identifier.othersmith_marcy_l_200808_edd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/smith_marcy_l_200808_edd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/25056
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to understand how two-year college faculty membersintegrate service-learning into their practice, with particular attention paid to the nature of facultyreflection about service-learning. Four research questions guided the study: First, whatmotivates faculty to participate in service-learning? Second, what is the process by whichfaculty members integrate service-learning into their practice? Third, what is the nature offaculty reflection surrounding service-learning? And fourth, what are faculty members’theoretical understandings of service-learning?This qualitative investigation involved interviews with twelve faculty members who areusing service-learning in courses at two-year technical or community colleges. Participantsrepresented a variety of academic and career or technical disciplines. Document analysis ofsyllabi and service-learning assignment sheets was also used as supporting evidence. Findings inthe study addressed each of the four research questions, and participants also gave inputregarding the role that service-learning plays in two-year colleges.Findings of the study suggest that faculty members are initially introduced to service-learning in a variety of ways, but are motivated to continue to participate in service-learning primarily by a belief that student learning, both academic and civic, is enhanced by participationin service-learning. Faculty members go through a similar process as they integrate service-learning into their practice, moving from a concern with logistics through a negotiation ofchallenges, and finally through reflection and evaluation, which leads to revision and furtherintegration of service-learning. Findings indicated that faculty members use informal reflection,particularly conversations with colleagues, more often than more formal methods, and that theirtheoretical understandings of service-learning are most often framed in terms of learning, ratherthan of service.Three conclusions were drawn: First, there is a five-step process through which facultymembers go as they integrate service-learning into their practice; this process includes theirinitial introduction to service-learning, as well as the process they have gone through as theybegin to use it. Second, faculty members frame both their practical and theoretical work withservice-learning in terms of learning. Third, faculty reflection about service-learning is mostoften informal and collaborative, and is an integral part of the integration process.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectService-learning
dc.subjecttwo-year college faculty
dc.subjectreflection
dc.titleTwo-year college faculty members using service-learning
dc.title.alternativeintegration into practice
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreeEdD
dc.description.departmentLifelong Education, Administration and Policy
dc.description.majorAdult Education
dc.description.advisorDesna Wallin
dc.description.committeeDesna Wallin
dc.description.committeeJohn Schell
dc.description.committeeLorilee Sandmann
dc.description.committeeSharan Merriam


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record