Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHerzinger, Caitlin Vanessa
dc.description.abstractSeveral meta-analyses relating to the assessment and treatment of severe maladaptive behaviors within the developmental disability research were reviewed. Following a synthesis of the meta-analyses results, three common themes were found and discussed: (a) behavioral treatment constitutes the large majority of published treatment outcomes, (b) treatments employing different functional assessments produced different outcomes, and (c) few characteristics of individuals were identified as mediating or moderating factors in treatment effectiveness. This current quantitative review of developmental disability research aims to make comparisons of different functional behavioral assessment methodologies, both across and within diagnostic categories. Quantitative synthesis data were used to answer questions regarding behavioral function, assessment type, differences based upon diagnostic category, and treatment effectiveness. Results indicate that assessment methodology does not impact treatment effectiveness, but both identified functions and treatment effectiveness are impacted by diagnosis. Implications for clinicians as well as future research directions are also discussed.
dc.subjectdevelopmental disability
dc.subjectmaladaptive behaviors
dc.subjectfunctional assessment
dc.subjectfunctional analysis
dc.titleAssessment and treatment of maladaptive behaviors within the developmental disability literature
dc.title.alternativeimpact on outcome variables
dc.description.departmentEducational Psychology and Instructional Technology
dc.description.majorEducational Psychology
dc.description.advisorJonathan M. Campbell
dc.description.committeeJonathan M. Campbell
dc.description.committeeMichele Lease
dc.description.committeeShawn Glynn
dc.description.committeeDavid Gast

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record