• Login
    View Item 
    •   Athenaeum Home
    • University of Georgia Theses and Dissertations
    • University of Georgia Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Athenaeum Home
    • University of Georgia Theses and Dissertations
    • University of Georgia Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Elites at the planning table

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2007-12
    Author
    Smith, Stephen Robert
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The problem this case study addressed was that theories for planning international academic exchange programs do not make central the role of stakeholders, ignoring important social, political, and ethical dimensions of practice. The purpose was to show how the University of Georgia University of Veracruz social work academic exchange came into existence through a social process of stakeholders negotiating interests within relationships of power. The Study was rooted in a theoretical perspective developed by Cervero and Wilson (1994a, 1994b, 1998, 2006). This perspective holds that program planning is a social activity whereby people construct educational programs by negotiating personal, social, and organizational interests in contexts marked by socially-structured power relations (Cervero & Wilson, 1998). The two research questions for the case study were:1. What are the interests of the major stakeholders and stakeholder groups for the academic exchange program?2. How have negotiations among and between stakeholders affected the features of the academic exchange program?Stakeholders were divided into six groups including administrators, faculty, and students from both institutions. The study used observations and interviews to determine the exchange history, stakeholder actions and interests, and whether the exchange met stakeholder interests. Stakeholders held personal, organizational, and societal interests. There was little within but significant across group interest conflict due to contextual asymmetries between stakeholder groups, institutions, and societies. The exchange program came into existence through alternating meta-negotiations about stakeholder power relationships and substantive negotiations about course features. Meta-negotiations and substantive negotiations shaped one another and the course. This study had four major conclusions: 1) internationalization of higher education is an agent and reactor to globalization; 2) stakeholders' negotiation of power and interests at planning tables frame and shape the development of international academic exchange programs; 3) values and rationales underpin strategies, programs, and policies driving international academic exchange; and, 4) power relations among and between elite stakeholder and researcher pose methodological challenges.
    URI
    http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/smith_stephen_r_200712_phd
    http://hdl.handle.net/10724/24499
    Collections
    • University of Georgia Theses and Dissertations

    About Athenaeum | Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of AthenaeumCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About Athenaeum | Contact Us | Send Feedback