Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLovel, James
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T02:51:25Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T02:51:25Z
dc.date.issued2007-12
dc.identifier.otherlovel_james_h_200712_ma
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/lovel_james_h_200712_ma
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/24440
dc.description.abstractLiterary Journalism is the least developed form of modern literature. It lacks a precisedefinition, a common description, a canon and an academic home. Without these conventions,literary journalism has become a bastard form, rejected by both the disciplines from which it wasderived. This study addresses these deficiencies by applying mass communication and literarytheories to the form to derive a definition and identify the essential elements of the form. Thestudy includes a comprehensive review of the scholarship and the analysis of a dozen booksgenerally classified as literary journalism. The study found that the original intent of the authorswho pioneered the form was to create journalism that read like fiction. Modern literaryjournalism has moved away from this founding definition and the form has become so nebulousthat it has little hope of gaining academic credibility. This study suggests returning to the formÕsoriginal definition and creating a new scholarship.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectLiterary Journalism
dc.subjectNew Journalism
dc.subjectSocial Realism
dc.titleLiterary journalism
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.degreeMA
dc.description.departmentGrady College of Journalism and Mass Communication
dc.description.majorJournalism and Mass Communication
dc.description.advisorLeara Rhodes
dc.description.committeeLeara Rhodes
dc.description.committeeValerie Boyd
dc.description.committeeBarry Hollander


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record