Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLi, Xiao
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T02:51:16Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T02:51:16Z
dc.date.issued2007-12
dc.identifier.otherli_xiao_200712_llm
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/li_xiao_200712_llm
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/24434
dc.description.abstractWhen its economic increase attracts the global attention, China is also looking for a break-through in its judicial reform. The Qi v. Chen case (2001) was considered to be the Chinese version of Marbury v. Madison and gave rise to a heated discussion of the judicial review power in China. This article will analyze the doubts on the Qi case and the prospects of judicial review it indicates through comparison with Marbury v. Madison. Although Qi v. Chen opened the door for constitutional litigation, its dramatic facts and strained application of the Constitution threw it into question. Nevertheless, its effect is unquestionable. However, Rome was not built in one day and only the Qi case cannot complete the establishment of a reliable judicial review system of China. This thesis will explain the difficulties China has in applying judicial review to ensure the implementation of the Constitution.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectjudicial review
dc.subjectconstitution
dc.subjectcomparison
dc.subjectChina
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.titleImports or made-in-China
dc.title.alternativecomparison of two constitutional cases in China and the United States
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.degreeLLM
dc.description.departmentLaw
dc.description.majorLaw
dc.description.advisorMilner Ball
dc.description.committeeMilner Ball
dc.description.committeeGabriel Wilner


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record