Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWang, Ye
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T02:48:38Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T02:48:38Z
dc.date.issued2007-08
dc.identifier.otherwang_ye_200708_llm
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/wang_ye_200708_llm
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/24312
dc.description.abstractWhere should China’s financial business be going? What would China’s financial industry look like? Should it continue the segregation along different financial lines adopted since 1995, or repeal the lines? What kind of model of financial conglomeration should China adopt? These questions are particularly significant especially after China’s entry into the World Trade Organization. According to the General Agreement on Trade in Service, China must open up the financial markets in five years. China’s financial institutions will be facing international rivals by then. The United States and European Union has adopted the financial holding company and universal bank system respectively. This article will take analysis the advantages and disadvantages of these two systems, and answer questions mentioned above.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectFINANCIAL HOLDING COMPANY
dc.subjectCHINA
dc.subjectU.S.
dc.subjectE.U.
dc.subjectUNIVERSIAL BANKING
dc.subjectFINANCE CONGLOMERATION
dc.subjectCUSTOMER PRIVACY PROTECTION
dc.subjectSUPERVISION OF FINANCE
dc.titleFinancial holding company system & relevant legislation
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.degreeLLM
dc.description.departmentLaw
dc.description.majorLaw
dc.description.advisorCharles R. T. O'Kelley
dc.description.committeeCharles R. T. O'Kelley
dc.description.committeeGabriel M. Wilner


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record