Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilks, Marla Kenimer
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T02:25:18Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T02:25:18Z
dc.date.issued2006-08
dc.identifier.otherwilks_marla_k_200608_ma
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/wilks_marla_k_200608_ma
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/23560
dc.description.abstractThe present study explores the joint effects of procedural justice and legitimacy on responses to injustice in the workplace. I consider three forms of legitimacy: authorization, endorsement, and propriety. Participants in the study engaged in role-playing by reading a vignette describing a situation of injustice and answering questions about their likely reactions. Although procedural justice and legitimacy fail to interact in expected ways, the results highlight both the importance of individual-level legitimacy in the form of propriety and gender in responses to injustice, and the effect of procedural justice on propriety. I provide suggestions for future research.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectprocedural justice
dc.subjectlegitimacy
dc.subjectbargaining tactics
dc.subjectworkplace conflict
dc.subjectauthorization
dc.subjectendorsement
dc.subjectpropriety
dc.titleResponses to injustice in the workplace
dc.title.alternativethe effects of procedural justice and legitimacy
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.degreeMA
dc.description.departmentSociology
dc.description.majorSociology
dc.description.advisorJody Clay-Warner
dc.description.committeeJody Clay-Warner
dc.description.committeeDawn Robinson
dc.description.committeeJames Balkwell


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record