Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLynch, John A
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-03T23:22:55Z
dc.date.available2014-03-03T23:22:55Z
dc.date.issued2005-08
dc.identifier.otherlynch_john_a_200508_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/lynch_john_a_200508_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/22720
dc.description.abstractSince the isolation of embryonic stem cells from humans, the words “stem cell” havebecome the focus of intense debate. The concern is with the nature of stem cells: are they themedical miracle that will cure diseases like Alzheimer’s disease, type-I diabetes and Parkinson’sdisease, or are they the murder of an innocent developing form of life? Attempts to answer thesequestions raise issues of definition – namelare stem ceylls?, wh This disseat rtation examinesthe strategies of definition used in the political and scientific debates from December 1998 toApril 2002, a period that covers the major political and scientific milestones in the early debateover embryonic stem cells. Definition is understood as the creation of a quasi-stable point fromwhich individuals launch arguments. Those quasi-stable points are created through theorganization of a series of “fragments.” Three strategies play a role in the development of thepolitical and scientific definitions of stem cell and embryonic stem cell. First, rhetors appeal tofuture applications as a justification for research: in this way, stem cells become defined by theirpurpose, the potential applications that they can be used to realize. Scientists offer a list of threepotential applications, which political rhetors reduce to one – direct medical application. Thisshift in application changes how stem cells are defined. Second, both scientific and politicalrhetors make use of the process of dissociation, where a unitary concept is divided into twodifferently-valued pairs, in defining embryonic stem cells. Scientific rhetors used dissociation toestablish embryonic stem cells as an ideal model for understanding the earliest stages ofdevelopment in mammals. Political rhetors used dissociation to undermine attempts byopponents of this research to define embryonic stem cells as the murder of a fetus or embryo.Third, both political and scientific rhetoric deploys an argument from hierarchy and its attendantambiguities to argue about different types of stem cells, especially embryonic and adult stemcells, and their capacity to attain the applications each group desires.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectstem cells
dc.subjectscience
dc.subjectpolitics
dc.subjectrhetoric
dc.subjectfragments
dc.subjectdissociation
dc.subjecthierarchy, application
dc.subjecttranslation
dc.titleWhat are stem cells?
dc.title.alternativestrategies of definition at the intersection of politics and science
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.description.departmentSpeech Communication
dc.description.majorSpeech Communication
dc.description.advisorCeleste M. Condit
dc.description.committeeCeleste M. Condit
dc.description.committeeKevin DeLuca
dc.description.committeeJohn Murphy
dc.description.committeeTom Lessl
dc.description.committeeVictoria Davion


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record