Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoldman, Brian Middleton
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-03T23:08:37Z
dc.date.available2014-03-03T23:08:37Z
dc.date.issued2004-12
dc.identifier.othergoldman_brian_m_200412_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/goldman_brian_m_200412_phd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/22116
dc.description.abstractPrior perspectives have suggested that authentic functioning is necessary for individuals’ to experience optimal levels of psychological health (e.g., Maslow, 1968; Rogers, 1961; Deci & Ryan, 2000). Recently, a multicomponent construct of dispositional authenticity was defined as the unimpeded operation of one’s core self in one’s daily enterprise (Goldman & Kernis, 2002; Kernis, 2003). Accordingly, dispositional authenticity is comprised of four interrelated components (1) awareness (e.g., self-understanding), (2) unbiased processing (e.g., objective self-evaluation), (3) behavior (e.g., congruence between one’s actions and needs), and (4) relational orientation (e.g., sincerity in relationship functioning with one’s intimates). Previously, Goldman, Kernis, Piasecki, Hermann & Foster (2004) found that higher dispositional authenticity scores were pervasively linked with healthier psychological (e.g., greater life satisfaction), and interpersonal adjustment (e.g., lower levels of attachment insecurity and cultural estrangement). The present study sought to examine the interrelationships between dispositional authenticity, various self characteristics considered to reflect a “stronger sense of self” (e.g., having high self-esteem level, a clearly defined self-concept, etc.), and individuals’ functioning within five commonly enacted social roles (i.e., being a son/daughter, a student, a romantic partner, a friend, and an employee), to predict their subsequent psychological adjustment. Seventy six participants’ completed several self-report measures at three separate experimental sessions over the course of approximately one month. Regression analyses revealed that dispositional authenticity, a stronger sense of self, and role functioning ratings were each significant predictors of subsequent ratings of psychological adjustment. However, when controlling for the influence of one another, only a stronger sense of self and healthy role functioning uniquely predicted subsequent psychological adjustment scores. The findings suggest authenticity influences psychological adjustment indirectly by its affect on either a stronger sense of self or one’s role experiences.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectAuthenticity
dc.subjectSelf-Esteem
dc.subjectWell-Being
dc.subjectSocial Roles
dc.subjectPsychological Well-Being
dc.subjectSubjective Well-Being
dc.subjectSelf-Concept Organization
dc.subjectSelf-Concept
dc.subjectSelf-Determination
dc.subjectMotivation
dc.subjectRomantic Relationships
dc.subjectPsychological Adjustment
dc.subjectFragile Self-Esteem
dc.subjectSelf-Concept Structure
dc.subjectSecure Self-Esteem
dc.subjectRole-Identities
dc.subjectPsychological Health
dc.titleThe interrelated roles of dispositional authenticity, self processes, and global role functioning in affecting psychological adjustment
dc.typeDissertation
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.description.departmentPsychology
dc.description.majorPsychology
dc.description.advisorMichael H. Kernis
dc.description.committeeMichael H. Kernis
dc.description.committeeLeonard L. Martin
dc.description.committeeKatherine Kipp
dc.description.committeeKeith W. Campbell


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record