Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDowns, Bradford Oliver
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-03T20:24:15Z
dc.date.available2014-03-03T20:24:15Z
dc.date.issued2003-05
dc.identifier.otherdowns_bradford_o_200305_ma
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/downs_bradford_o_200305_ma
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/20768
dc.description.abstractThe dominant consensus in modern moral theory suggests that comparative judgments concerning moral values can be adequately made apart from theism. Building on the thought of Charles Hartshorne and other process thinkers, I hold that values such as good, desirability, or importance are meaningless unless we posit God, properly understood in a metaphysical theory, as real and the basis or telos according to which moral values are established and measured.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.titleModern moral theory : a process response
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.degreeMA
dc.description.departmentReligion
dc.description.majorReligion
dc.description.advisorWilliam Power
dc.description.committeeWilliam Power
dc.description.committeeCarolyn Medine
dc.description.committeeBradley Bassler


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record