Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorParameshwaran, Anupama
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-03T20:21:31Z
dc.date.available2014-03-03T20:21:31Z
dc.date.issued2002-12
dc.identifier.otherparameshwaran_anupama_200212_llm
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/parameshwaran_anupama_200212_llm
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/20643
dc.description.abstractPublic policy is one of the defenses that a court or a party may invoke in order to resist enforcement of an unjust foreign award or judgment. The purpose of this study is to analyze the status of the public policy as a defense to enforcement in the U.S and to examine its success rate. The thesis will contain suggestions to make public policy a more meaningful defense with respect to the enforcement of foreign judgments and its role in bringing about uniformity in the field of foreign judgments will be analyzed.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectArbitration
dc.subjectpublic policy
dc.subjectEnforcement of foreign awards
dc.subjectForeign judgments
dc.subjectNew York convention
dc.titleConflict of laws in the enforcement of foreign awards and foreign judgments : the public policy defense and practice in U.S. courts
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.degreeLLM
dc.description.departmentLaw
dc.description.majorLaw
dc.description.advisorGabriel Wilner
dc.description.committeeGabriel Wilner
dc.description.committeeThomas Schoenbaum


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record