Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKim, Myeong-sik
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-03T20:20:47Z
dc.date.available2014-03-03T20:20:47Z
dc.date.issued2002-12
dc.identifier.otherkim_myeong-sik_200212_llm
dc.identifier.urihttp://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/kim_myeong-sik_200212_llm
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/20604
dc.description.abstractThe political question doctrine is one of the controversial issues in Korea and U.S. The most important point is, however, that the current trend on political questions in Korea is in line with that of American judicial activism. In other words, both countries are trying to narrow the range of the doctrine. Nonetheless, the two are proceeding in sharply opposite directions. Fully matured, even excessively extended American judicial activism should return to the classical separation of powers doctrine. In contrast, a developing Korean judicial activism should be accelerated by the support and encouragement of the people, in support of the belief that the constitutional adjudication system is the last resort for protection of the constitutional rights of the people. These contradicting views on the political question urge reconsideration of the status of the
dc.languageeng
dc.publisheruga
dc.rightspublic
dc.subjectThe University of Georgia
dc.subjectMaster of Laws
dc.subjectComparative analysis
dc.subjectConstitutional law
dc.subjectPolitical question doctrine
dc.subjectJusticiability
dc.subjectIndependence of the Judiciary
dc.subjectKorea
dc.titleAn end to the political question doctrine in Korea? : a comparative analysis
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.degreeLLM
dc.description.departmentLaw
dc.description.majorLaw
dc.description.advisorGabriel M. Wilner
dc.description.committeeGabriel M. Wilner
dc.description.committeeDan T. Coenen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record