• Login
    View Item 
    •   Athenaeum Home
    • University of Georgia Theses and Dissertations
    • University of Georgia Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Athenaeum Home
    • University of Georgia Theses and Dissertations
    • University of Georgia Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A portrait of public servants: empirical evidence from comparisons with other citizens

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2001-12
    Author
    Brewer, Gene Arnold
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Theories of government bureaucracy and many public policies rest on bold assumptions about the mindset and behavior of public servants. This study investigates bureaucratic stereotypes by comparing public servants with other citizens on four sets of attributes: personality traits, work-related attitudes and behaviors, civic attitudes and behaviors, and political attitudes and behaviors. These comparisons are made on approximately thirty different constructs measured with American National Election Study data. The findings are remarkably consistent. Compared with other citizens, public servants exhibit more positive personality types, and they are more empathic, altruistic, prosocial, and public service-oriented. Moreover, public servants are more active in civic and political affairs. They exhibit an extended sense of responsibility and more closely resemble "model citizens." Most convincing of all is the aggregate pattern of differences between public servants and other citizens. This pattern provides a strong basis for rejecting existing bureaucratic stereotypes and proposing a replacement model that is both theoretically- and empirically-derived. This replacement model has important implications for the theory and practice of public administration. Since public servants differ from other citizens in positive rather than negative ways, concerns about bureaucratic accountability in democratic government may be greatly reduced. Moreover, the findings reported in this study are not consistent with public choice stereotypes, thus revealing a congenital defect of the theory. For these reasons, this study and its implications should kindle considerable interest among scholars and practitioners of public administration, as well as among those who interact frequently with public servants – for example, elected officials, third party service providers, and citizens.
    URI
    http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/brewer_gene_a_200112_dpa
    http://hdl.handle.net/10724/20291
    Collections
    • University of Georgia Theses and Dissertations

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Applications in pharmacokinetic modeling 

      Arnold, Esther (uga, 2003-05)
      In this paper I discuss the melancholy nature of happiness in two short stories by Herman Melville, “The Piazza” and “Bartleby, the Scrivener.” Applying Melville’s passage from Moby-Dick on the “conceit of attainable ...
    • Antecedents, mediators, and consequences of leadership, motivation, commitment, and managerial reform systems in the public sector 

      Park, Sung Min (uga, 2007-05)
      The three empirical essays in this dissertation analyze the public management issues of 1) organizational leadership and work motivation, 2) organizational commitment, and 3) managerial reform systems. In the first essay, ...
    • Teaching media relations by teaching media relationships 

      Pettigrew, Justin Evans (uga, 2013-08)
      This dissertation examines the current state of media relations practice and how textbooks and professors view teaching media relations from a dialogic perspective. Theoretical advances are suggested, as are new ways to ...

    About Athenaeum | Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of AthenaeumCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About Athenaeum | Contact Us | Send Feedback