• Login
    View Item 
    •   Athenaeum Home
    • BioMed Central Open Access Articles
    • Open Access Articles by UGA Faculty
    • View Item
    •   Athenaeum Home
    • BioMed Central Open Access Articles
    • Open Access Articles by UGA Faculty
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Homoplastic Microinversions and the Avian Tree of Life

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    1471-2148-11-141.xml (88.66Kb)
    1471-2148-11-141.pdf (1.209Mb)
    1471-2148-11-141-S1.XLS (98.5Kb)
    1471-2148-11-141-S3.XLS (71.5Kb)
    1471-2148-11-141-S2.PDF (6.148Mb)
    Date
    2011-05-25
    Author
    Braun, Edward L
    Kimball, Rebecca T
    Han, Kin-Lan
    Iuhasz-Velez, Naomi R
    Bonilla, Amber J
    Chojnowski, Jena L
    Smith, Jordan V
    Bowie, Rauri CK
    Braun, Michael J
    Hackett, Shannon J
    Harshman, John
    Huddleston, Christopher J
    Marks, Ben D
    Miglia, Kathleen J
    Moore, William S
    Reddy, Sushma
    Sheldon, Frederick H
    Witt, Christopher C
    Yuri, Tamaki
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Abstract Background Microinversions are cytologically undetectable inversions of DNA sequences that accumulate slowly in genomes. Like many other rare genomic changes (RGCs), microinversions are thought to be virtually homoplasy-free evolutionary characters, suggesting that they may be very useful for difficult phylogenetic problems such as the avian tree of life. However, few detailed surveys of these genomic rearrangements have been conducted, making it difficult to assess this hypothesis or understand the impact of microinversions upon genome evolution. Results We surveyed non-coding sequence data from a recent avian phylogenetic study and found substantially more microinversions than expected based upon prior information about vertebrate inversion rates, although this is likely due to underestimation of these rates in previous studies. Most microinversions were lineage-specific or united well-accepted groups. However, some homoplastic microinversions were evident among the informative characters. Hemiplasy, which reflects differences between gene trees and the species tree, did not explain the observed homoplasy. Two specific loci were microinversion hotspots, with high numbers of inversions that included both the homoplastic as well as some overlapping microinversions. Neither stem-loop structures nor detectable sequence motifs were associated with microinversions in the hotspots. Conclusions Microinversions can provide valuable phylogenetic information, although power analysis indicates that large amounts of sequence data will be necessary to identify enough inversions (and similar RGCs) to resolve short branches in the tree of life. Moreover, microinversions are not perfect characters and should be interpreted with caution, just as with any other character type. Independent of their use for phylogenetic analyses, microinversions are important because they have the potential to complicate alignment of non-coding sequences. Despite their low rate of accumulation, they have clearly contributed to genome evolution, suggesting that active identification of microinversions will prove useful in future phylogenomic studies.
    URI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-141
    http://hdl.handle.net/10724/19639
    Collections
    • Open Access Articles by UGA Faculty

    About Athenaeum | Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of AthenaeumCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About Athenaeum | Contact Us | Send Feedback