Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUmar, Nasir
dc.contributor.authorLitaker, David
dc.contributor.authorSchaarschmidt, Marthe-Lisa
dc.contributor.authorPeitsch, Wiebke K
dc.contributor.authorSchmieder, Astrid
dc.contributor.authorTerris, Darcey D
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-12T14:54:30Z
dc.date.available2013-06-12T14:54:30Z
dc.date.issued2012-01-03
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research. 2012 Jan 03;12(1):1
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10724/19599
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Patients often express strong preferences for the forms of treatment available for their disease. Incorporating these preferences into the process of treatment decision-making might improve patients' adherence to treatment, contributing to better outcomes. We describe the methodology used in a study aiming to assess treatment outcomes when patients' preferences for treatment are closely matched to recommended treatments. Method Participants included patients with moderate and severe psoriasis attending outpatient dermatology clinics at the University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany. A self-administered online survey used conjoint analysis to measure participants' preferences for psoriasis treatment options at the initial study visit. Physicians' treatment recommendations were abstracted from each participant's medical records. The Preference Matching Index (PMI), a measure of concordance between the participant's preferences for treatment and the physician's recommended treatment, was determined for each participant at t1 (initial study visit). A clinical outcome measure, the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, and two participant-derived outcomes assessing treatment satisfaction and health related quality of life were employed at t1, t2 (twelve weeks post-t1) and t3 (twelve weeks post-t2). Change in outcomes was assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance. The association between participants' PMI scores at t1 and outcomes at t2 and t3 was evaluated using multivariate regressions analysis. Discussion We describe methods for capturing concordance between patients' treatment preferences and recommended treatment and for assessing its association with specific treatment outcomes. The methods are intended to promote the incorporation of patients' preferences in treatment decision-making, enhance treatment satisfaction, and improve treatment effectiveness through greater adherence.
dc.titleOutcomes Associated with Matching Patients' Treatment Preferences to Physicians' Recommendations: Study Methodology
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.date.updated2013-06-07T13:52:08Z
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderNasir Umar et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record